So everyone on earth has something to say about the whole
Phil Robertson ordeal. Even me! And here I want to say one more thing. However,
I don’t want to get into a debate of the so-called hypocrisy of the Left or the
so-called blind support of Robertson and Duck Dynasty by the Right. What I want
to do here is just say a few things about the article itself, written by Drew
Magary. It is always important to get a little context to such a vehement
debate. You can read it here.
I think the purpose of this article is very
straightforward. The author shows that Robertson is not only a man of strong
convictions (again…whether you agree with them or not…), but he is a man whose
understanding of the world is very black and white, cut and dry, and very
simplistic. For Robertson, there is very little, if any, room for grey. Repeatedly,
the author inserts quotes from Robertson that reminisce of what he believes to
be the “good ol’ days.”
Intermingled with this presentation, the writer
interjects his thoughts and opinions, and the writer uses these at times to
question Robertson’s worldview. For example, at one point in the article, Magary
recounts a rant by Robertson on the theological heritage of America. During
that rant, Magary quotes Robertson as he addresses the moral laxity of American
society, “Everything is blurred on what’s right and wrong…Sin become fine.” To
this, Magary interjects, “What, in your mind, is sinful.”
…and then we read some of the famous quotes….
The final words of the article are particular telling.
Essentially, Magary asks if Robertson’s desire for a simple life, driven by
Christian principles, is even possible. Tellingly, Magary does not think so, as
he resigns himself to the “godless part of America that Phil is determined to
save.”
So again, what about this article? What should we be
taking away from it? I wish I could say that we should set aside the
conversation of Robertson’s supposed bigotry or prejudice, but we can’t. The
reality is that his explicit commentary and imagery of the homosexual lifestyle
is too much to be ignored. As I have said before, Robertson is at fault for
this. He was too graphic to help any conversation that could have been fruitful.
But this brings me to the point that I want to talk about just briefly…his
roughness, coarseness, and black and white worldview.
The article also talks about pre-Christian Robertson. In
particular, Magary recounts the story when Robertson badly beat a bar owner, so
bad that he had to flee the state. If it were not for money exchanging hands
and the negotiations of Robertson’s wife, Robertson would have likely landed in
jail. Robertson also abused his family, pills, and alcohol. He was a mess! So
what does this all mean? It means that this man is defined by his radical conversion
experience. This is critical, I believe, to understanding Robertson and his
worldview.
Through my experiences, I have realized that people who
experience a radical conversion experience often view the world in black and
white and cut and dry terms. I have had the privilege of knowing a few people like
this, one of whom I still know very closely. Furthermore, such people carry with
them a history. Indeed, the Bible makes it very clear that Christians are a New
Creation upon conversation, but the reality of the human existence is that
those pre-Christian experiences have had an impact on our personalities, etc.
So, I believe that we should not expect Robertson to be
anything but cut and dry, coarse, blunt….and at times vulgar.
No comments:
Post a Comment