In 2011, 20th Century Fox released The Big
Year, starring Steve Martin (Stu), Jack Black (Brad), and Owen Wilson
(Kenny). Now, I know what you are probably thinking, but no. This movie is not
a mindless comedy built upon crude humor. Rather, it is movie that, while
having very funny moments, is rather serious and can force some very real and
pointed introspection.
Stu, Brad, and Kenny are very different people who have
different personalities and life-circumstances. Stu is an accomplished CEO, who
built his company from the ground up. Brad is an average-Joe computer programmer.
Kenny is an affluent ego-maniac. The common thread between these three men is a
love of birds. More specifically, the common thread is an attempt at what is
called a “Big Year,” which in birding circles refers to an effort to see how
many different specifies of birds one can observe in one calendar year.
The movie juxtaposes the efforts of these three men,
including the individual obstacles that face each man in their quest for their Big
Year. Stu becomes increasingly aware of his mortality and eventually realizes
that he has spent too much time building his company and that the waning years
of his life must be spent with his family. Brad spends every moment of his
spare time and money in the pursuit of his passion while suffering the critical
inquires of his father. Ultimately, through a series of events, Brad’s father
comes to understand his son’s passion. Kenny, who is the proclaimed King of
Birding and world record holder for the number of different birds observed in
one year, will let nothing and no man keep him from sitting atop of the
pinnacle…not even his marriage.
What is very revealing is that each character, at
particular points in the movie, faces what I like to refer to as cross-roads
moments. At specific junctures, each is forced to consider what is more
important—the pursuit of a passion at all costs or allowing that passion
to be merely a passion and not an obsession. In one scene, Kenny has a heated
exchange with his wife, who senses that Kenny’s pursuit is tearing apart their
relationship. In that exchange, Kenny refers to his passion as a “calling.”
This struck me as an interesting choice of words, particularly as I could not
help but connect this movie with the vocational pursuits of many young
evangelicals.
As young Evangelicals, we often hear the term “calling”
tossed around, particularly at evangelical institutions of education. Students
are often encouraged to gain a sense of their calling so to fashion their career
goals accordingly. The assumption is that everyone has skills and abilities, and
as Christians, we should seek a vocation that maximizes one’s abilities in a
specific service to the Kingdom of God. Often, though not necessarily intended,
this logic translates into a fixation upon a particular vocation. Thus, a
perception is creation that a calling cannot be fulfilled outside of a
particular vocation.
The unfortunate reality is that with such logic there is
a very real possibility of a devastating conundrum. What happens when the
pursuit of a calling comes up empty? For example, what happens when one’s
pursuit of a calling in full time missions puts his or her family in a
potentially compromising and destructive environment? I have seen it happen.
Or, what happens if a calling to business requires that one put his or her life
savings on the line, knowing full well that such an “investment’ could send the
family into bankruptcy? What happens when the pursuit of a degree or education
financially hinders your family, perhaps for years to come? Again, I have seen
it come to fruition.
The potency of such a conundrum arises when we realize
that these undesirable, and in some cases crippling, circumstances appear not
in the midst of vain pursuit, but rather in the pursuit of something that is
God-glorifying. What is one to make of, and how is one to respond to, crippling
circumstances that are the result of an honest, God-glorifying pursuit? Shall
we press on at all costs under the mantra that, “If this is my calling, all
will be well in the end?”
This is a tough question, but it needs to be considered,
particularly since it is usually avoided (at least in my experience). Moreover,
no. I do not think that Christians should press forward at all costs. Consider Acts
16. In this text, Paul receives a vision of a man, who tells him to stop his
intended pursuit into Asia but rather head to Macedonia. From there, Paul heads
to Philippi, Corinth, Ephesus, and other very important places. Of course, we
can only speculate what would have happened if Paul would have been stubborn
and unwilling to yield to the nudging of the Holy Spirit. However, the writer
seems to imply that the face of the New Testament Church would have been
drastically different.
Young Evangelicals need to gain a proper understanding of
a calling, particularly in light of its role in determining one’s vocational choices.
If we understand a calling not as something that is fixed to a particular
vocation, then the Christian is more receptive to adapt in the face of crippling
circumstances. Of course, I am not advocating that everyone deviate at the
sniff of a stiff headwind. However, during those moments when something must
give, understanding that one’s calling as a Christian is not fixed to one
particular vocation but rather to the Lord whom I serve can be rather freeing…at
least it has been for me.
Indeed, these statements may seem trivial to some of you
reading this. With all due respect, these words are not for you. Rather, they
are for those who have experienced the emotions described in this post. They
are for the young evangelical college student, seminary student, and graduate
student who have sensed a burden placed upon their soul, experienced the
guidance of God Almighty, and have still seen their efforts come back
relatively fruitless.
At the end of the movie, Stu and Brad are on the phone
discussing the published results of their Big Year. Brad finished second and
Stu fourth. The winner is, predictably, Kenny, but at the expense of having
lost his marriage. The movie ends with this simple but profound juxtaposition.
No comments:
Post a Comment